From: neil <74742.1651@CompuServe.COM> To: marx-int Subject: M-I: Jesse Jackson & reformism Date: Friday, April 10, 1998 5:10 PM dear friends, One of the main problems gaining understanding of the vexed problem of taking on reformist influences and reformists 'big names' bogarting of masses fight backs and actions is the kind of political obscurantism that the likes of Louis P and his trends like Committees of Correspondence (CoC) -exCPUSAers peddle here. Louis P thinks we build anti-imperialist movements "through elecoral politics as well as mass action" He thus lives in a previous age of capitalism. In the modern epoch electoral politics of all stripes is counterposed to mass action and working class independence from liberal-laborism--and bosses "democracy'.. It is the practice that provides the uplift to theory here too. Think about it. As cocerns the anti-US agression movements in here the 80s supporting Central American workers/farmers. When these movements gained in numbers and political advance/experience in the odd years, the electoral charade would push struggles back near step 1 in the even ones. Some Democrats a la the DSA, CP, CISPES, POR, etc. would hand over the podiums and slogans/programmes amenable to all and sundry Democratic Party trojan horses time after time , the confusion and illusions in US "democracy' fostered were poison against the advance of the struggles. Behind the scenes these same Democrats including Jesse Jackson, were in tandem with the conservatives in trying to spike the class struggles in the Central America and the USA. Jackson was always pro-NATO in spite of pacifist sermons to gullible lib-labs and even advocated sending US troops to South Africa if open civil war there had broken out. JJ made his peace with arch-racists like Orville Faubus and George "segregation forever" Wallace What Louis P. and other pragmatists can't comprehend is that the JJ's of the world are bourgeois themselves, albeit liberals. JJs PUSH group was on the Government payroll for $500,000/yr + since the early 70s. JJ and co. represent a bourgeois wing of the black nationality whos job responsibilities for ties to corporate capital are to keep the black masses (and others) under control, come hell or high water of poor workers rebellions.. Louis Ps. apologetics for JJ and his trend spill out clearly when he claims only after 1988, JJ "re-entered the Democratic Party inner circles with a vengeance" . One question Louis P. When other than for those legends in their own minds reformist -swamp misleaders , had Jackson ever left the Democratic Party anyway?? Reformist Jackson is more honest than Louis P. here. Fielding questions from fawning political neophytes at a 1984 Rainbow conference about a possible break with the capitalist Democrats, Jackson stated in words to the effect " you don't burn down your bank when you are still making money in it" . In JJs case and with other petty bourgeois outfits, you can take this literally as well as figuratively. But this gets to some materialist analysis of politics and economy, something Louis P and co. avoid on this list like Dracula fear of the Cross. As to Louis P. quoting Lenin on criticizing 'ultra-leftism " in 1920, of course he shows no historical context here, but Lenin turned out to be wrong a few times too, genius that he was. This is the same period when Lenin came out for "critical support" for the British Labor Party , a party which Lenin himself had correctly castigated as becoming counter- revolutionary in 1914-15 for supporting British Imperialism inWW1, and entering the government cabinets, ordering expulsions and jailings of anti-war socialist and workers, for supporting conscription acts, wage cuts, anti- "hun" campaigns etc. If you use the Louis P mechanical formulas, you would still be supporting "critically' the British Labor Party of T. Blair today. Wow , really a rrrrrrrevolutionary stance! Neil communist-left and proud http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3303 --- from list marxism-international@lists.village.virginia.edu ---